Every campaign here is a real proposal, on real land, faced by real people. We don't lead these fights — local communities do. We help: with facts, tools, and a louder voice. Find one near you, and lend yours.
ILI Group's "Cato" proposal would place six buildings up to 35m high near the village of Auchtertool — the first of a planned network of giant Scottish data centres. Campaigners estimate it could draw power on the scale of a fifth of Scotland's energy. It is planned over a 16th-century castle ruin and a wildlife site, and no end-user has been identified.
This is speculation built into the land. It is the second Scottish AI data centre to reach this stage; the first, in Edinburgh, was refused.
The "Southside" proposal by Roxburghe Estates and Sunlaws Development Company would place three large two-storey buildings on Lammermuir moorland at Clawbare, near Longformacus — open countryside known for wildlife, dark skies and hill farming. Over 6,000 people have already signed against it.
It is at pre-application stage: a formal application to Scottish Borders Council is expected later in 2026. The community is organising now, before it is lodged — which is exactly when a voice counts most.
Buckinghamshire Council twice refused a 90MW hyperscale data centre on green-belt land at Iver, judging it inappropriate. The government overturned that refusal on appeal. Campaign groups Foxglove and Global Action Plan are now bringing a landmark legal challenge — the first of its kind against a UK data centre approval.
It is a test case for every community whose voice is overruled from above. Watch it closely; what happens here echoes everywhere.
This is not a British problem. From Texas to Ireland, Chile to the Netherlands, communities are saying no to data centres that would drink their water and strain their grids. In 2025, local opposition delayed or cancelled projects worth an estimated $156 billion. A 2026 Gallup poll found 70% of people oppose a data centre being built near them. You are not alone, and you are not powerless.
Every campaign brief links to the live planning portal. Search by reference number to find the full documentation, site maps, and environmental assessments.
Our Data Centre Watch briefs summarise the key facts in plain language — site size, environmental designations, water and energy impacts, key objection grounds.
Formal objections carry weight when they cite specific planning policy grounds. Our Tools page has AI-assisted templates for drafting objections that land.
Share the campaign with local residents, councillors, community groups, and media. Time is always short. Local pressure changes planning outcomes.
Government proposals to designate AI infrastructure as nationally significant could bypass local planning objections entirely. Multiple sites across England's green belt are at risk.
A proposed brownfield data centre in Didcot is being watched as a test case for responsible siting. If approved on former industrial land, it could establish a precedent the movement needs.
Multiple proposed data centre sites in Scotland and Wales have been flagged for proximity to water-stressed catchments. Formal applications are anticipated in Q3 2026.
Planning applications are published on local authority portals — and they move fast. If you've seen a planning notice, a site hoarding, or a local news report about a data centre development on sensitive land, tell us.
We review every report. Verified sites are added to the Data Centre Watch intelligence hub within 48 hours.
What to include: location, planning reference if known, local authority, any deadline you're aware of. Screenshots welcome via email to hello@firewalkers.earth